Trump and republican policies are making it harder and more expensive for families to own a home. Tariffs on lumber, cabinets, and other goods raise building and repair costs, adding thousands to the price of a typical house. Crackdowns on law-abiding workers shrink the construction workforce, slowing building and pushing wages—and project prices—higher. Rollbacks of energy standards and paused rebates mean bigger utility bills and fewer discounts for upgrades. Weaker disaster rules and a possible flood-insurance lapse increase risk and can delay home sales. Uncertainty around Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could also raise mortgage rates, making monthly payments more expensive.
The example content is only intended to illustrate potential uses of the included research, it has not been vetted or cleared for paid distribution.
¶ Tariffs and trade actions are raising the cost of building, buying, and maintaining homes for american families
- In September 2025 the administration imposed new tariffs of 10% on lumber and 25% on kitchen cabinets, vanities, and upholstered furniture (effective Oct. 14), measures that industry and business groups warn will increase housing and remodeling costs borne by consumers. (reuters.com)
- The administration has broadly expanded the use of “national security” tariff authority to cover household and building goods, a shift critics say will raise compliance and production costs that filter into consumer prices. (washingtonpost.com)
- Housing economists and builders estimate the tariff package could add roughly $7,500–$10,000 to the cost of an average new single‑family home, chiefly via higher prices for lumber, gypsum, steel, appliances, and other inputs. (cnbc.com)
- Financial outlets report the new wood-product tariffs will further pressure construction budgets already strained by materials inflation, with added risk of future tariff rate increases up to 50% on some items. (ft.com)
¶ Trump promised to deport criminal migrants, but instead has focused on law-abiding workers, constricting construction labor and pushing up homebuilding and repair costs on homeowners
- The administration escalated deportation operations in 2025 (e.g., in the Chicago region), part of a broader crackdown that states and localities say is sweeping up many without criminal records. (reuters.com)
- Economists, including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, have warned that tighter immigration policy is slowing labor-force growth; with roughly a third of U.S. construction workers being immigrants, this amplifies shortages and wage pressures in homebuilding. (cnbc.com)
- Independent analysis finds mass deportations would shrink the construction labor force and exacerbate the national housing shortage, reducing new-home supply. (urban.org)
- State-level experts likewise project labor shortages and higher housing and construction costs as deportations remove significant shares of workers from key trades. (cronkitenews.azpbs.org)
¶ Rollbacks of home energy standards and freezes of consumer rebates are increasing household utility bills and blocking cost‑saving upgrades
- DOE postponed or withdrew multiple appliance efficiency measures in 2025 (including gas instantaneous water heaters), and EPA moved to overhaul WaterSense product specifications—reversals that reduce long‑term consumer energy and water bill savings. (energy.gov)
- An analysis by the Appliance Standards Awareness Project estimates that the administration’s efficiency rollbacks would impose a net $43 billion cost on households and businesses through higher utility bills. (appliance-standards.org)
- States have paused or delayed Inflation Reduction Act Home Energy Rebate programs that cut homeowners’ retrofit costs—such as heat pumps and weatherization—because of a federal funding freeze, denying consumers thousands of dollars per project and higher-bill savings. (cnbc.com)
¶ Disaster resilience and insurance stability are being weakened, raising risks and costs for homeowners
- FEMA stopped implementing the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) after a Jan. 20 executive order, rolling back higher-elevation, forward‑looking flood protections for federally funded projects that FEMA and DHS previously said save money over time. (fema.gov)
- FEMA’s own guidance shows the FFRMS typically adds under 2% to upfront project costs while reducing future damages and community costs; rescinding it sacrifices those long‑run savings and resilience. (fema.gov)
- A looming lapse of the National Flood Insurance Program threatens to halt new policies and delay or cancel home sales in flood zones where insurance is required for government‑backed mortgages, directly harming homeowners and buyers. (apnews.com)
- FEMA has also suspended distribution of key preparedness grants unless states certify deportation‑adjusted population data and align with immigration directives, a politicized funding squeeze that state officials warn undermines disaster readiness relied on by homeowners. (reuters.com)
- Internal proposals and public statements aim to raise thresholds for federal disaster aid and “wean” states off FEMA after 2025’s hurricane season—moves emergency managers say would leave households more exposed and recovery more costly. (cnn.com)
¶ Dismantling fair‑housing oversight and zoning incentives removes federal levers that expand housing supply and access for aspiring homeowners
- HUD replaced the 2021 AFFH regime with an interim rule deeming minimal, general certifications sufficient and ending the more rigorous planning and accountability framework—reducing federal pressure on exclusionary local policies that limit home supply. (federalregister.gov)
- HUD formally terminated the Biden‑era AFFH approach, asserting it as “red tape,” despite long‑standing evidence that robust fair‑housing implementation targets segregation and barriers that constrain where families can buy homes. (hud.gov)
- Coverage contemporaneous with the change documents the administration scrapping the fair‑housing initiative, restoring self‑certification in place of enforceable planning tied to federal funds. (politico.com)
- Empirical research links loosening restrictive land‑use rules to increases in housing supply (while tighter rules raise rents), indicating that weakening federal pro‑housing levers is likely to worsen affordability for everyday would‑be homeowners. (urban.org)
¶ Instability and politicization in mortgage finance risk higher borrowing costs for homeowners
- A 2025 shake‑up at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—replacing boards and signaling privatization aims—has drawn warnings that missteps could disrupt mortgage‑backed securities markets and push up mortgage rates paid by homebuyers. (washingtonpost.com)
- Financial press reports echoed concerns that aggressive restructuring of the GSEs could undermine investor confidence and increase costs across the conventional mortgage market relied upon by millions of homeowners. (wsj.com)